h1

“Bug RegisterClientScriptBlock” di ASP.NET

7 Juli 2009

Beberapa menit setelah menulis tentang register tag javascript ke ASP.NET penulis menemukan artikel menarik mengenai penggunaan salah satu parameter di method RegisterClientScriptBlock. Intinya adalah jangan menggunakan this.GetType() tapi gunakan typeof (Class_name).

Berikut cuplikan artikelnya :

One of the things that was introduced in .NET 2.0 was a new mechanism for managing registration of client script into the page, via the new ClientScriptManager class, instead of the page’s dedicated RegisterClientScriptBlock method. In the process of moving the API, MS also saw fit to add a new Type parameter to the method.

This reflects the fact that the best practice when calling Page.RegisterClientScriptBlock was to formulate a unique key for your script that incorporated the fully qualified name of the class doing the registration of the script, as a way to avoid unseemly clashes between script registrations. That way, only one copy of the script for a particular control gets registered per page, no matter how many such controls appear on the page – and at the same time, the script shouldn’t trample on the scripts needed by other controls.

With ClientScriptManager, you’re spared the need to formulate the name for your script to incorporate said fully qualified typename by the API, which asks you to pass a type object in, which it will use to uniquely key all the scripts registered.

So far so good. The one fly in the ointment for anyone calling the new API is figuring out how to actually obtain an appropriate type object to pass in.

The MSDN example code, and all the other examples I can find, the idiom adopted seems to be:

Page.ClientScript.RegisterClientScriptBlock(this.GetType(), "Script", scriptText);

This is not good. Why not? Well, this.GetType() is a way of getting the runtime type of an object. That’s not necessarily the same type as the one in which this bit of code is being declared.

So what? Does that actually make any difference? Well, yes, if anyone ever writes a control that inherits from your control.

If I create a control called Widget that calls RegisterClientScriptBlock() passing this.GetType(), then whenever I put a few Widget controls on the page, the script block will be registered once, and only once. That’s great.

Then later on, I develop a SpecialisedWidget control that inherits from Widget. I drop it onto the page, and suddenly, RegisterClientScriptBlock is getting called with the same script, but two different typesWidget, and SpecialisedWidget. The script block ends up appearing on the page twice. Cue tricky hard to track JavaScript bugs that take ages to find…

Now, if Widget had originally registered that script block passing typeof (Widget) as the type argument instead of this.GetType(), the whole problem wouldn’t arise, because even when the SpecialisedWidgets are registering script on the page, the script is registered with the type qualifier of Widget. And as a side bonus, the IL will be more efficient, because typeof (Widget) is a kind of type literal, which the compiler can embed right into the code, rather than a runtime dispatched method call to a reflection API.

So the lesson of the day is, use typeof to get a static compile-time type reference when calling the ASP.NET 2.0 RegisterClientScriptBlock method, not GetType() to get a dynamic runtime type.

Penulis sendiri baru mengetahui fakta ini, mudah-mudahan berguna bagi para pembaca.

sumber asli : http://blogs.ipona.com/james/archive/2006/10/03/6710.aspx

Iklan

Tinggalkan Balasan

Isikan data di bawah atau klik salah satu ikon untuk log in:

Logo WordPress.com

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Logout / Ubah )

Gambar Twitter

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Facebook

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Google+

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Logout / Ubah )

Connecting to %s

%d blogger menyukai ini: